Macrolog

Adaptation

I had the good fortune last week to attend not one, but two free media screenings. Tuesday morning was spent watching Analyse That (the sequel to Analyse This, natch); it was nothing to write home about. Wednesday’s screening of Adaptation at the IFC, however, was a much more interesting prospect, not only because I’ve heard so many good things about it and have been looking forward to seeing it for some time.

Director Spike Jonze and screenwriter Charlie Kaufman’s latest collaboration is nearly impossible to describe without giving too much away; the best I can do is that it’s a film about a film about a film about a book. I think. If you loved Being John Malkovich you’ll definitely enjoy Adaptation, probably more than once; in more than one way it’s a direct follow-on from that film, certainly a head-scratcher, full of clever twists and tricks, and even more confounding when you realise it was based on actual events. (The publicity surrounding the film has brought Susan Orlean’s book, on which the original screenplay was based, to a whole new audience.)

Whether you’ll love it, though, is a different story. Unfortunately the film is not without its disappointments; an excellent, truly inspired first half gives way to a final act that careers into self-parody, Kaufman mocking the writer’s block of his fictional self whilst suffering from the same affliction. (He could certainly benefit from some constructive criticism.) In turn, Jonze’s direction turns pedestrian, as if he handed the reins to his AD to go skateboarding with his Jackass buddies. (Something I wouldn’t put past him, with his reputation.) As a result, Adaptation is not as consistenly enthralling as its predecessor, at times far too knowingly ironic for its own good. I couldn’t help but feel slightly cheated; I expected a magic show, but what I got was merely smoke and mirrors.

But then again, maybe I was asking for too much. I could certainly think of worse ways to spend a couple of hours - Analyse That, anyone?

Mon 10 Feb 2003 at 19:12   ·


Comments (3 responses so far)

Posted by
eoin 
Tue 11 Feb 2003
at 14:04

what does natch mean?i’ve seen you journalist types use it before. stop making up words

Posted by
Mac 
Tue 11 Feb 2003
at 18:13

‘Natch’ is a contraction of ‘natural’ or ‘naturally’. American slang, I believe. It’s in the dictionary.

Posted by
eoin 
Tue 11 Feb 2003
at 21:28

ic, well it is a word that i have an irrational dislike of, so please desist from using it

Post a comment


 
   Required
   Required
   Optional
 

Please Note:
This forum welcomes any notes, queries or criticism, but please, keep it to the fair and relevant kind. Any instances of flaming, trolling or spamming will not be tolerated.

You may use basic HTML inline tags if you wish; any other tags will be stripped automatically. If you want to include a link it must be tagged manually. Markdown syntax is welcome if you know how to use it.

About

Portrait of MacDaraThis is the personal website of MacDara Conroy, a production journalist and mediavore in Dublin, Ireland. Read more »


Message

Keep the internet free

SOPA and PIPA may be shelved for now, but Ireland’s own ‘anti-piracy’ proposal is alive and well, and it’s bad news for everyone. Sign the petition at StopSopaIreland.com and make your voice heard. Learn more »


Details

You are reading Adaptation, a Macrolog entry by MacDara Conroy. It is filed under Sound & Screen, and was published in February 2003.

Tags

#film #movies


Context

This day in history: 10 February


Continuum

Mon 10 Feb 2003 at 23:39
Mon 10 Feb 2003 at 19:12
Sun 09 Feb 2003 at 15:26